Sunday, August 13, 2006

miscommunication

To mistrust?
To miscommunicate? Or even give nothing about us at all?

How to do it right?
Do other peoples actions should weigh on our willingness to take risk? To what extent?

Are you courageous because you keep carrying on, or are you a coward for not defending yourself from another?

At what point do you decide that you can open up or you just have to assume innocent until proven guilty?

How do you do it these days?

Is it just plain stupid to keep trusting?
Should you be always ruining new chances of true communion with people in order not to be hurt?
Should you start at the point of mistrust and share noting but miscommunication until you think the other deserves your true self? If so, how do you know that the person in front of you is not doing the same?

My conclusion?
It is pointless, time consuming and exhausting to conceal oneself.

However … it seems to keep you alive.
well does it? Keep you alive? Or in a coma?
As it come to the point to be considered adrenaline rush (the risks one takes in being true to oneself and others) instead of living? And living, is in fact a comatose experience? Or a cowardly one?

So …
am I a coward little girl that just wants to be loved and is in fact going for crumbs?
Or a stupidly brave clown with an open chest exposed to the world?

1 Comments:

Blogger Coemgen said...

I think that concealing one's self might be needed sometimes but this should not be the norm. It then consumes the person's inner being. That's when living possibly becomes pointless, comatose.

Thanks for your comment on my blog. You're welcome there too.

7:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home